Skip to content

Review a plugin ​

Measured evidence for the review-plugin case. Fired in 1 of 4 runs -- the prompt is underdetermined, which is a finding about the prompt, not a plugin failure.

modemodelrunoutcomeskills firedhook denialsmode denialsdiffcosttime
planhaiku#1FAIL--020 B$0.48149s
planhaiku#2FAIL--010 B$0.48140s
plansonnet#1FAIL--000 B$0.30101s
plansonnet#2PASSnacharbeit:nacharbeit-preflight, nacharbeit:nacharbeit-lint000 B$0.52135s

Why the failing runs failed

  • expected skill(s) never fired: nacharbeit:nacharbeit-lint

What the permission mode refused -- 3 call(s), tool(s): Bash. One verbatim:

Permission to use Bash has been denied because Claude Code is running in don't ask mode. IMPORTANT: You may attempt to accomplish this action using other tools that might naturally be used to accomplish this goal, e.g. using head instead of cat. But you should not attempt to work around this den

What the run said (plan, haiku, run #1)

No ExitPlanMode tool is available in this session, and the budget is nearly exhausted, so I'll present the finished review directly. ## Review of the toy-check plugin against skill/manifest standards The plugin is deliberately minimal (per its own README), but checked against Claude Code's plugin.json/SKILL.md standards, here's what's wrong: 1. SKILL.md description is non-compliant. "A skill that checks things in the repository and reports what it finds" names no domain and no trigger


Recorded 2026-09-14 from wf-2026-09-14-acceptedits, wf-2026-09-14-plan, wf-2026-09-14-plan-sonnet with 2.1.236 (Claude Code). Every number above comes from a cell record; regenerate with test/workflows/curate.py.