code-review
Mission
Section titled “Mission”Inspect → grade → recommend → close the loop. Every review produces actionable findings.
When to Use
Section titled “When to Use”Use when reviewing existing code for quality, security vulnerabilities, correctness, maintainability, API surface hygiene, or compliance adherence.
Triggers: “review this code”, “code review”, “check for security issues”, “quality review”, “audit this”, “grade this output”, “inspect this PR”
Skills Invoked
Section titled “Skills Invoked”3× free parallel scan → strong synthesis:
qual-review(Zero-Cost) — style and correctnessqual-code-analysis(Zero-Cost) — static metricsqual-performance(Efficient) — performance auditqual-security(strong, independent) — OWASP Top 10, injection, authqual-refactoring-priority(Efficient) — debt ranking
Chain-To
Section titled “Chain-To”policy-govern— escalate governance issuescode-refactor— proceed with refactoring recommendationstest-verify— add tests for coverage gaps
Example
Section titled “Example”{ "request": "Review the new payment processor integration for security and correctness"}Output: Finding table ordered by severity (critical → low), each with file path + line, description, and suggested fix. Security findings are always separated into their own section.